Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

An important principle of the use of blood components is the ability to trace them from the donor to the recipient. This study set out to establish whether there was sufficient documentation in patient case notes to confirm the transfusion of blood components in a sample of computer blood bank records at two large teaching hospitals in UK. The criteria for verification of transfusion were taken from guidelines from the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (Transfusion Medicine 1999, 9, 227-238). The blood bank computer records indicated that 486 units of blood components were issued and not returned to the blood bank for 80 patients during a 2-month period. Of the 486 units, transfusion of 409 units (84%) was verified against patient notes, but 77 units (16%) could not be verified as received by the patient. The study showed that documentation of transfusions was variable. For example, written prescriptions were only found for 204 units (42%). These results have implications for 'lookback studies' involving blood transfusion. Further efforts are required to educate those involved in transfusing blood about the need for accurate documentation.


Journal article


Transfus Med

Publication Date





127 - 130


Blood Banks, Blood Donors, Blood Transfusion, Data Collection, Documentation, Humans, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Transfusion Reaction, United Kingdom