Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AIMS: Adequate adipose tissue blood flow (ATBF) is essential for its metabolic and endocrine functions. From a metabolic point of view, sufficient increases in ATBF after meals permits full storage of excess energy into fat, thus protecting other tissues against the toxic effects of fatty acids and glucose spillover. It was previously shown that postprandial increases in ATBF are blunted in obese and insulin-resistant subjects, and that much of the postprandial ATBF response is the result of β-adrenergic activation. Examination of previously recorded data on postprandial ATBF responses revealed an underlying heterogeneity, with postprandial ATBF being largely unresponsive to food stimuli in a substantial proportion of normal weight healthy people (low responders). Our study tests the hypothesis that this unresponsive pattern is due to resistance to β-adrenergic stimulation in adipose tissue. METHODS: Five responders and five low responders were selected from a previously studied cohort and matched for BMI (20.5±0.7 vs 22±1 kg/m(2), respectively), gender (male/female: 2/3) and age (30±3 vs 37±6 years). Subcutaneous adipose tissue microinfusions of stepwise increasing doses of isoproterenol were performed with concomitant monitoring of blood flow, using the (133)Xenon washout technique. RESULTS: Although BMI was similar between responders and low responders, there were significant differences in fat mass (9.9±1.6 vs 14.4±1.6 kg; P<0.05) and four-point skinfold thickness (33±4 vs 52±16 mm; P<0.05). Lack of ATBF response to oral glucose was confirmed in the low responder group. In responders, ATBF was higher at baseline (5.4±1 vs 3.4±1 mL/min/100 g of tissue) and responded more distinctly to increasing isoproterenol doses (10(-8) M: 7.6±1.4 vs 4.9±1; 10(-6) M: 12.5±1.7 vs 7.5±1.6; and 10(-4) M: 20 ±1.7 vs 9±0.9 mL/min/100 g of tissue). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the lack of glucose-stimulated ATBF is associated with resistance to sympathetic activation in adipose tissue.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/j.diabet.2011.06.005

Type

Journal article

Journal

Diabetes Metab

Publication Date

02/2012

Volume

38

Pages

27 - 33

Keywords

Adrenergic Agonists, Adult, Blood Glucose, Body Mass Index, Cohort Studies, Drug Resistance, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Male, Postprandial Period, Regional Blood Flow, Skinfold Thickness, Subcutaneous Fat, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sympathetic Nervous System