Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Limited use of whole blood has continued despite a general move to blood component therapy in recent years. This paper describes the results of a questionnaire survey which was distributed to haematologists in charge of blood banks in England and North Wales to ascertain how much and for which indications whole blood was being requested. There was a 58% response rate. More than 90% of hospitals that responded had not requested whole blood during the last 12 months. Indications for the use of whole blood were primarily in paediatric practice, mostly for neonatal exchange transfusion or paediatric surgery (cardiac or craniofacial). Infrequent use in adult practice was for "major bleeding" when whole blood was available, and in cardiac surgery, when post-operative bleeding was unresponsive to standard replacement therapy. The evidence for the use of whole blood in preference to component therapy in the massive transfusion setting was reviewed, and no compelling evidence was found for its routine use for this indication. It is worth noting that, as currently supplied in the UK, "whole blood" is not strictly "whole" as the leucocyte-depletion process removes platelets.

Original publication




Journal article


Clin Lab Haematol

Publication Date





391 - 396


Adult, Age Factors, Blood Banks, Blood Component Transfusion, Blood Transfusion, Child, Data Collection, Hospitals, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, United Kingdom