Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Fe absorption from water-soluble forms of Fe is inversely proportional to Fe status in humans. Whether this is true for poorly soluble Fe compounds is uncertain. Our objectives were therefore (1) to compare the up-regulation of Fe absorption at low Fe status from ferrous sulphate (FS) and ferric pyrophosphate (FPP) and (2) to compare the efficacy of FS with FPP in a fortification trial to increase body Fe stores in Fe-deficient children v. Fe-sufficient children. Using stable isotopes in test meals in young women (n 49) selected for low and high Fe status, we compared the absorption of FPP with FS. We analysed data from previous efficacy trials in children (n 258) to determine whether Fe status at baseline predicted response to FS v. FPP as salt fortificants. Plasma ferritin was a strong negative predictor of Fe bioavailability from FS (P 

Original publication

DOI

10.1017/S0007114510004903

Type

Journal article

Journal

Br J Nutr

Publication Date

04/2011

Volume

105

Pages

1245 - 1250

Keywords

Adolescent, Adult, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Biological Availability, C-Reactive Protein, Child, Diphosphates, Female, Ferritins, Ferrous Compounds, Food, Fortified, Hemoglobins, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Intestines, Iodine, Iron, Iron Isotopes, Iron, Dietary, Male, Nutritional Status, Sodium Chloride, Dietary, Solubility, Young Adult