Repeated nebulisation of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial
Alton EWFW., Armstrong DK., Ashby D., Bayfield KJ., Bilton D., Bloomfield EV., Boyd AC., Brand J., Buchan R., Calcedo R., Carvelli P., Chan M., Cheng SH., Collie DDS., Cunningham S., Davidson HE., Davies G., Davies JC., Davies LA., Dewar MH., Doherty A., Donovan J., Dwyer NS., Elgmati HI., Featherstone RF., Gavino J., Gea-Sorli S., Geddes DM., Gibson JSR., Gill DR., Greening AP., Griesenbach U., Hansell DM., Harman K., Higgins TE., Hodges SL., Hyde SC., Hyndman L., Innes JA., Jacob J., Jones N., Keogh BF., Limberis MP., Lloyd-Evans P., Maclean AW., Manvell MC., McCormick D., McGovern M., McLachlan G., Meng C., Montero MA., Milligan H., Moyce LJ., Murray GD., Nicholson AG., Osadolor T., Parra-Leiton J., Porteous DJ., Pringle IA., Punch EK., Pytel KM., Quittner AL., Rivellini G., Saunders CJ., Scheule RK., Sheard S., Simmonds NJ., Smith K., Smith SN., Soussi N., Soussi S., Spearing EJ., Stevenson BJ., Sumner-Jones SG., Turkkila M., Ureta RP., Waller MD., Wasowicz MY., Wilson JM., Wolstenholme-Hogg P.
© 2015 Alton et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY. Background: Lung delivery of plasmid DNA encoding the CFTR gene complexed with a cationic liposome is a potential treatment option for patients with cystic fibrosis. We aimed to assess the efficacy of non-viral CFTR gene therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Methods: We did this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial in two cystic fibrosis centres with patients recruited from 18 sites in the UK. Patients (aged ≥12 years) with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV < inf > 1 < /inf > ) of 50-90% predicted and any combination of CFTR mutations, were randomly assigned, via a computer-based randomisation system, to receive 5 mL of either nebulised pGM169/GL67A gene-liposome complex or 0·9% saline (placebo) every 28 days (plus or minus 5 days) for 1 year. Randomisation was stratified by % predicted FEV < inf > 1 < /inf > ( < 70 vs ≥70%), age ( < 18 vs ≥18 years), inclusion in the mechanistic substudy, and dosing site (London or Edinburgh). Participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the relative change in % predicted FEV < inf > 1 < /inf > . The primary analysis was per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01621867. Findings: Between June 12, 2012, and June 24, 2013, we randomly assigned 140 patients to receive placebo (n=62) or pGM169/GL67A (n=78), of whom 116 (83%) patients comprised the per-protocol population. We noted a significant, albeit modest, treatment effect in the pGM169/GL67A group versus placebo at 12 months' follow-up (3·7%, 95% CI 0·1-7·3; p=0·046). This outcome was associated with a stabilisation of lung function in the pGM169/GL67A group compared with a decline in the placebo group. We recorded no significant difference in treatment-attributable adverse events between groups. Interpretation: Monthly application of the pGM169/GL67A gene therapy formulation was associated with a significant, albeit modest, benefit in FEV < inf > 1 < /inf > compared with placebo at 1 year, indicating a stabilisation of lung function in the treatment group. Further improvements in efficacy and consistency of response to the current formulation are needed before gene therapy is suitable for clinical care; however, our findings should also encourage the rapid introduction of more potent gene transfer vectors into early phase trials. Funding: Medical Research Council/National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme.