Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AIMS: To assess transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) using second harmonic imaging with Valsalva manoeuvre compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the diagnosis of right to left cardiac and pulmonary shunts. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients referred for TEE underwent TTE with bubble contrast. Bubbles in the left atrium within three cardiac cycles were considered diagnostic for a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and later as a pulmonary shunt. Greater than 20 bubbles in the left atrium was considered a large shunt and less than 20 a small shunt. TEE was performed immediately afterwards and read blinded to the TTE results. Pick-up rates were similar with 19 TEE positive (13 PFO) and 18 TTE positive (14 PFO) patients. There were five TEE positive/TTE negative cases who had significantly poorer TTE image quality score (2.7 +/- 0.8 vs 1.9 +/- 0.6, p < 0.05). There were six TEE negative/TTE positive cases, two cases requiring Valsalva manoeuvre to become positive. The Valsalva manoeuvre significantly increased the number of bubbles shunting (10 +/- 11 vs 20 +/- 19, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: TTE with Valsalva manoeuvre is as good as TEE in diagnosing shunts. Valsalva manoeuvre increases the size of shunt. Both techniques produce false negative results.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/S1525-2167(03)00076-3

Type

Journal article

Journal

Eur J Echocardiogr

Publication Date

06/2004

Volume

5

Pages

176 - 181

Keywords

Aged, Cardiac Output, Coronary Circulation, Coronary Thrombosis, Echocardiography, Embolism, Paradoxical, Female, Heart Septal Defects, Atrial, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Embolism, Sodium Chloride, Valsalva Maneuver