Skip to main content

Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to set an optimal fit of the estimated LVEF at hourly intervals from 24-hour ECG recordings and compare it with the fit based on two gold-standard guidelines. METHODS: Support vector regression (SVR) models were applied to estimate LVEF from ECG derived heart rate variability (HRV) data in one-hour intervals from 24-hour ECG recordings of patients with either preserved, mid-range, or reduced LVEF, obtained from the Intercity Digital ECG Alliance (IDEAL) study. A step-wise feature selection approach was used to ensure the best possible estimations of LVEF levels. RESULTS: The experimental results have shown that the lowest Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) between the original and estimated LVEF levels was during 3-4 am, 5-6 am and 6-7 pm. CONCLUSION: The observations suggest these hours as possible times for intervention and optimal treatment outcomes. In addition, LVEF classifications following the ACCF/AHA guidelines leads to a more accurate assessment of mid-range LVEF. SIGNIFICANCE: This study paves the way to explore the use of HRV features in the prediction of LVEF percentages as an indicator of disease progression, which may lead to an automated classification process for CAD patients.

Original publication

DOI

10.1109/JBHI.2020.3002336

Type

Journal article

Journal

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform

Publication Date

03/2021

Volume

25

Pages

746 - 754

Keywords

Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Heart Rate, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Stroke Volume, Ventricular Function, Left