Ultrasound- Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kotronias RA.; Bray JJH.; Rajasundaram S.; Vincent F.; Delhaye C.; Scarsini R.; Marin F.; Terentes-Printzios D.; Halcox JPJ.; Mamas MA.; Kharbanda R.; Van Belle E.; Banning AP.

Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Ultrasound- Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Strategy for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kotronias RA., Bray JJH., Rajasundaram S., Vincent F., Delhaye C., Scarsini R., Marin F., Terentes-Printzios D., Halcox JPJ., Mamas MA., Kharbanda R., Van Belle E., Banning AP.

See more details

[Figure: see text].

Original publication

DOI

10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.010742

Type

Journal article

Journal

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

Publication Date

10/2021

Volume

Keywords

fluoroscopy, morbidity, peripheral vascular diseases, punctures, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, ultrasound, Catheterization, Peripheral, Femoral Artery, Fluoroscopy, Humans, Risk Factors, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Treatment Outcome