Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

AIM: It has been shown that compared with healthyweight children, overweight and obese primary school-aged children have a higher incidence of hyperinsulinism, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. It is therefore important to investigate clinically relevant markers of cardiovascular risk in children. Waist circumference is a simple, non-invasive anthropometric measure, but its association with cardiovascular risk profile in young Australian children is not clear. METHODS: This study presents cross-sectional data from the Growth and Development Study. The sample included 70 healthy weight children, 50 overweight children and 28 obese children (n = 148, 9.6 +/- 1.9 years). All children had a medical assessment which included a physical examination (waist circumference, blood pressure), and investigations including glycated haemoglobin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, insulin, glucose and total homocysteine levels. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed in a subgroup of children (n = 119). Body mass index (BMI) was determined and BMI Z-scores calculated. RESULTS: In a multilevel model, waist circumference was the only significant anthropometric predictor of lipid profile (high-density lipoprotein beta = -0.01, P < 0.05; triglycerides beta = 0.01, P < 0.005), systolic blood pressure (beta = 0.29, P < 0.05), fasting insulin (beta = 0.16, P < 0.005), insulin concentrations throughout the oral glucose tolerance (60 min beta = 1.07, P < 0.005; 120 min beta = 1.42, P < 0.001) and insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR): beta = 0.03, P < 0.05), with increasing waist circumference associated with increasing cardiovascular risk. In contrast, BMI Z-score was only predictive of 120-min glucose concentrations during the OGTT (beta = 0.34, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Waist circumference is a better anthropometric indicator than BMI Z-score of cardiovascular risk in Australian primary school-aged children. Even in young children, measurement of waist circumference represents a simple, non-invasive screening tool to identify children with an increased cardiovascular risk profile.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01411.x

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2008-12-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

44

Pages

709 - 715

Total pages

6

Keywords

Anthropometry, Body Mass Index, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Overweight, Risk Factors, Waist Circumference, Western Australia