Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Genomic variants associated with inherited cardiac conditions yet detected incidentally (‘secondary findings’) are likely to arise with increasing frequency as genome sequencing transitions into clinical practice. Since genotyping has until recently been directed by clinical diagnosis, assessment and management of individuals found to harbour such a variant as a secondary finding is unclear. Here we illustrate some diagnostic and psychosocial complexities of inherited cardiac condition secondary findings, exemplified by disclosure of a pathogenic variant in KCNQ1, associated with long QT syndrome, to a healthy male enrolled in diagnostic genome sequencing as an unaffected relative. This early case represents a shift from ‘phenotype-to-genotype’ to ‘genotype-to-phenotype’; we describe clinical evaluation, family history and a qualitative research interview with the secondary finding recipient, discuss the role of specialist services in variant interpretation, genetic counselling and clinical assessment, and some challenges of realising improved health outcomes following disclosure of a secondary finding.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1161/CIRCGEN.118.002316

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2018-10-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

11

Keywords

ethics, genotype, long QT syndrome, phenotype, public policy, Genetic Testing, Genotype, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Mutation