Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

ObjectiveAmidst growing numbers of women in certain areas of medicine (eg, general practice/primary care), yet their continued under-representation in others (eg, surgical specialties), this study examines (1) whether medical professionals mistakenly infer that women are now broadly well represented, overestimating women's true representation in several different areas and roles; and (2) whether this overestimation of women's representation predicts decreased support for gender equality initiatives in the field, in conjunction with one's own gender.DesignCross-sectional survey.SettingUK-based medical field.Participants425 UK medical consultants/general practitioners and trainees (ST/CT1+/SHO/Registrar); 47% were female.Main outcome measuresEstimates of women's representation in different areas/roles within medicine, examined as a composite estimate and individually; and a multi-item measure of support for gender-based initiatives in medicine.ResultsMedical professionals tended to overestimate women's true representation in several different areas of medicine (general practice, medical specialties, surgical specialties) and in various roles (consultants/general practitioners, trainees, medical school graduates). Moreover, these erroneous estimates predicted a decreased willingness to support gender-based initiatives, particularly among men in the field: composite overestimation*respondent gender interaction, B=-0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.01, p=0.01. Specifically, while female respondents' (over)estimates were unrelated to their level of support (B=0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02, p=0.92), male respondents' tendency to overestimate the proportion of women in medicine predicted lower support for gender-based initiatives (B=-0.04, 95% CI -0.06 to -0.02, p<0.001).ConclusionsWhile some progress has been made in gender representation in the medical field, this research illustrates that there are still barriers to gender equality efforts and identifies who within the field is focally maintaining these barriers. It is those individuals (particularly men) who overestimate the true progress that has been made in women's representation who are at highest risk of undermining it.

Original publication

DOI

10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054769

Type

Journal article

Journal

BMJ open

Publication Date

21/03/2022

Volume

12

Addresses

Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK C.Begeny@exeter.ac.uk.

Keywords

Humans, Cross-Sectional Studies, Medicine, Specialties, Surgical, Female, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Gender Equity