Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

We propose a learning method to identify which specific regions and features of images contribute to a certain classification. In the medical imaging context, they can be the evidence regions where the abnormalities are most likely to appear, and the discriminative features of these regions supporting the pathology classification. The learning is weakly-supervised requiring only the pathological labels and no other prior knowledge. The method can also be applied to learn the salient description of an anatomy discriminative from its background, in order to localise the anatomy before a classification step. We formulate evidence pinpointing as a sparse descriptor learning problem. Because of the large computational complexity, the objective function is composed in a stochastic way and is optimised by the Regularised Dual Averaging algorithm. We demonstrate that the learnt feature descriptors contain more specific and better discriminative information than hand-crafted descriptors contributing to superior performance for the tasks of anatomy localisation and pathology classification respectively. We apply our method on the problem of lumbar spinal stenosis for localising and classifying vertebrae in MRI images. Experimental results show that our method when trained with only target labels achieves better or competitive performance on both tasks compared with strongly-supervised methods requiring labels and multiple landmarks. A further improvement is achieved with training on additional weakly annotated data, which gives robust localisation with average error within 2 mm and classification accuracies close to human performance.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1007/978-3-319-59050-9_17

Type

Conference paper

Publication Date

2017-01-01T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

10265 LNCS

Pages

210 - 222

Total pages

12