Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The hemophilia treatment landscape has been profoundly reshaped by non-factor therapies (NFT), which provide effective prophylaxis regardless of inhibitor status while reducing treatment burden through subcutaneous administration. However, their hemostatic effect cannot be reliably assessed using routine laboratory assays. This limitation creates a growing need for tools capable of evaluating the global hemostatic status in patients receiving these agents. Monitoring remains essential, as interindividual variability necessitates personalized management to ensure adequate hemostatic control during bleeding episodes or surgery while minimizing the risk of thrombotic complications. Currently, no validated assay accurately reflects the global hemostatic status of patients receiving NFTs, leaving clinicians to rely on empirical decisions that may entail significant risk. The thrombin generation assay (TGA) is the most promising candidate to address this gap, although its correlation with clinical phenotype varies according to assay conditions and clinical context. Establishing standardized, clinically validated monitoring strategies-particularly TGA-based approaches-is therefore crucial for safe therapeutic guidance and reflects a paradigm shift from factor replacement toward optimization of thrombin generation in modern hemophilia care.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1055/a-2873-8324

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-05-12T00:00:00+00:00