Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

It is important to predict outcome for colorectal cancer patients following surgery, as almost 50% of patients undergoing a potentially curative resection will experience relapse. It is clear that present prognostic categories such as Dukes or TNM staging are too broad, and further refining is required to prognosticate for high-risk subgroups. One approach is to determine a phenotype associated with recurrence. We compared 2 methods of analyzing such data. Pathologic data from a large clinical trial was analyzed for 403 patients. The outcome modeled was disease recurrence. The results from logistic regression analysis and a neural network approach are compared with respect to receiver operator characteristic plots, which estimate the fit of the model. The best logistic regression model gives a result of 66%, and the neural network approach 78%. The conclusion from this study is that the neural network approach is superior to regression analysis. Further analyses are in progress using a larger patient sample size (n > 1000), improved statistical models, and a more refined neural network.

Original publication




Journal article


Clin Colorectal Cancer

Publication Date





239 - 244


Colorectal Neoplasms, Humans, Logistic Models, Models, Statistical, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neural Networks, Computer, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Survival Analysis